Bibliography

 

Ackerman, Farrell; James P. Blevins; & Robert Malouf 2009, Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds.), Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition, 54-82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ackerman, Farrell; Gregory Stump; & Gert Webelhuth 2011, Lexicalism, periphrasis and implicative morphology. In B. Borsley & K. Börjars (eds.), Non-transformational theories of grammar, 325-58.  Oxford:  Blackwell.

Albright, Adam 2002, The identification of bases in morphological paradigms. UCLA doctoral dissertation.

Albright, Adam 2008, Inflectional paradigms have bases too: Evidence from Yiddish. In Asaf Bachrach & Andrew Nevins (eds.), Inflectional identity, 271-312.  Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Albright, Adam & Bruce Hayes 2003, Rules vs analogy in English past tenses: A computational/ experimental study. Cognition 90, 119-61.

Alegre, Maria, & Peter Gordon 1999, Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language 40, 41–61.

Anderson, Stephen R. 1992,  A-morphous morphology.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Aronoff, Mark 1994, Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.

Baayen, R. Harald; Ton Dijkstra; & Robert Schreuder 1997, Singulars and plurals in Dutch:  Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language 37, 94-117.

Baayen, R.H.; J. McQueen; T. Dijkstra; & R. Schreuder 2003, Frequency effects in regular inflectional morphology: Revisiting Dutch plurals. In R.H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (eds.), Morphological structure in language processing, 355-390. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Baayen, R. Harald; Robert Schreuder; Nivja de Jong; & Andrea Krott 2002, Dutch inflection: The rules that prove the exception. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 30, II, 61-92.  

Baayen, R. Harald; Lee H. Wurm; & Joanna Aycock. 2007. Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words. The Mental Lexicon 2, 419–463.

Baerman, Matthew; Dunstan Brown; & Greville G. Corbett 2010, Morphological complexity: A typological perspective. Manuscript, University of Surrey.

Bane, Max 2008, Quantifying and measuring morphological complexity. In Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 69-76. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

Bescherelle: La conjugaison pour tous. Paris: Hatier, 2006.

Blevins, James P. 2006, Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42, 531-573.

Bonami, Olivier & Gilles Boyé 2002, Sup­ple­tion and de­pen­den­cy in in­flec­tion­al mor­phol­o­gy. In Frank Van Eynde, Lars Hel­lan & Dorothee Beer­mann, (eds.), The Pro­ceed­ings of the 8th In­ter­na­tion­al Con­fer­ence on Head-​Driv­en Phrase Struc­ture Gram­mar. 51–70. Stan­ford: CSLI Pub­li­ca­tions.

Bonami, Olivier; Gilles Boyé; & Fabiola Henri 2011,  Measuring inflectional complexity: French and Mauritian. Paper presented at the Workshop on Quantitative Measures in Morphology and Morphological Development, Center for Human Development, UC San Diego, January 15-16, 2011.

Brigel, Rev. J 1872, A grammar of the Tuḷu language. Mangalore: Basel Mission Book & Tract Depository.

Brown, Dunstan & Roger Evans 2010, Inflectional defaults and principal parts: An empirical investigation. In Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG10 Conference, Université Paris Diderot, 234-54. Stanford: CSLI Publications

Brown, Dunstan, & Andrew Hippisley 2012,  Network morphology: A defaults-based theory of word structure.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Buchholz, E. 2004, Grammatik der finnischen Sprache. Bremen: Hempen Verlag.

Bybee, Joan 1995, Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10, 425-455.

Cameron-Faulkner, Thea & Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy 2000, Stem alternants as morphological signata: Evidence from blur avoidance in Polish nouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18, 813-835.

Carstairs, Andrew 1987,  Allomorphy in inflexion. London: Croom Helm.

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew 1991, Inflection classes: Two questions with one answer. In Frans Plank (ed.), Paradigms: The economy of inflection, 213-253. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew 1994, Inflection classes, gender and the Principle of Contrast. Language 70, 737-788.

Chandler, Steve 2010, The English past tense: Analogy redux. Cognitive Linguistics 21, 371-417.

Corbett, Greville G. & Norman M. Fraser 1993, Network Morphology: a DATR account of Russian nominal inflection, Journal of Linguistics 29: 113-142.

Corbett, Greville G. 1991, Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Corbett, Greville G. 2005, The canonical approach in typology. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories (Studies in Language Companion Series 72), 25-49. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.

Corbett, Greville G. 2007, Canonical typology, suppletion and possible words. Language 83, 8-42.

Corbett, Greville G. 2009. Canonical inflectional classes. In Fabio Montermini, Gilles Boyé & Jesse Tseng (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 6th Décembrettes, 1-11. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

Dahl, Östen 2004, The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Dahl, Östen 2009, Testing the assumption of complexity invariance: the case of Elfdalian and Swedish. In Sampson et al. (2009), 50-63.

Davies, Mark 2008-present, The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 425 million words, 1990-present. Available online at http://www.americancorpus.org.

de Groot, Casper 2008, Morphological complexity as a parameter of linguistic typology: Hungarian as a contact language. In M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki, & F. Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 191-215. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

De Vries, James A. & Sandra A. De Vries 1997, An overview of Kwerba verb morphology. Papers in Papuan Linguistics 3 (Pacific Linguistics, A-87), 1-35.

Deutscher, Guy 2009, “Overall complexity”: a wild goose chase? In Sampson et al. (2009), 243-51.

Dictionnaire du français contemporain. Paris: Larousse, 1971.

Dressler, Wolfgang U.; Marianne Kilani-Schoch; Natalia Gagarina; Lina Pestal; & Markus Pochtrager. 2006, On the typology of inflection class systems. Folia Linguistica 40/1-2, 51-74.

Ernestus, Mirjam & R. Harald Baayen 2003, Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language 79, 5-38.

Ernestus, Mirjam & R. Harald Baayen 2004, Analogical effects in regular past tense production in Dutch. Linguistics 42, 873-903.

Evans, Roger & Gerald Gazdar 1989, Inference in DATR. In Harold L. Somers & Mary McGee Wood (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 66–71. Manchester: Association for Computational Linguistics.

Evans, Roger & Gazdar, Gerald 1996, DATR: A language for lexical knowledge representation. Computational Linguistics 22: 167-216.

Finkel, Raphael; Lei Shen; Gregory Stump; & Suresh Thesayi 2002, KATR: A set-based extension of DATR (Technical Report 346-02). Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Department of Computer Science.  (ftp://ftp.cs.uky.edu/cs/techreports/346-02.pdf.)

Finkel, Raphael & Gregory Stump 2006a, Principal parts and degrees of paradigmatic transparency.  Paper presented at the Conference on Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, September 22-23, 2006.

Finkel, Raphael & Gregory Stump 2006b, Principal parts and the intersection of conjugational paradigms. Paper presented at the 12^th International Morphology Meeting, Budapest, May 25-28, 2006.

Finkel, Raphael & Gregory Stump 2007, Principal parts and morphological typology. Morphology 17, 39-75.

Finkel, Raphael & Gregory Stump 2008a, Principal parts and degrees of paradigmatic transparency. Paper presented at the Southeast Morphology Meeting, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom, September 26, 2008.

Finkel, Raphael & Gregory Stump 2008b, Principal parts and French conjugation classes. Paper presented at Décembrettes 6:  Colloque International de Morphologie, « Morphologie et classes flexionnelles », December 4-5, 2008, Université de Bordeaux, France.

Finkel, Raphael & Gregory Stump 2009, Principal parts and degrees of paradigmatic transparency. In James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds.), Analogy in grammar: Form and Acquisition, 13-53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Finkel, Raphael & Gregory Stump 2010, Predictability, predictiveness and paradigm complexity. Paper presented at the workshop ‘Morphological Complexity: Implications for the Theory of Language’, Harvard University, January 22, 2010.

Finkel, Raphael & Gregory Stump 2011a, Blinkered vision:  Sources of opacity in inflectional paradigms. Paper presented at the Workshop on Quantitative Measures in Morphology and Morphological Development, Center for Human Development, UC San Diego, January 15-16, 2011.

Finkel, Raphael & Gregory Stump 2011b, Entropy, predictability and predictiveness. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Challenges of Complex Morphology to Morphological Theory, Linguistic Society of America Summer Institute, Boulder, CO, July 27, 2011.

Finkel, Raphael & Gregory Stump 2012, What are principal parts, and what can they tell us about an inflectional system’s morphological complexity? Paper presented at the Conference on Morphological Complexity, British Academy, London, January 15, 2012.

Göksel, Aslı & Celia Kerslake 2005, Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. London and New York: Routledge.

Grant, John 1823, Institutes of Latin grammar (2^nd edition, enlarged). London: G. & W. B. Whittaker.

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1960, A quantitative approach to the morphological typology of language. International Journal of American Linguistics 26, 178-94.

Hall, K. C. 2009, A probabilistic model of phonological relationships from contrast to allophony. Ph. D.thesis, The Ohio State University.

Hare, Mary; Michael Ford; & William Marslen-Wilson 2001, Ambiguity and frequency effects in regular verb inflection. In Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds.),  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 181–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hawkins, J. A. 2004, Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heim, Michael 1982, Contemporary Czech. Columbus, OH: Slavica.

Hockett, C. F. 1958, A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan.

Huffman, David A. 1952, A method for the construction of minimum-redundancy codes.  Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers (I.R.E.), September 1952, 1098–1102.  

Humboldt, Wilhelm von 1836, Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: F. Dümmler.

Jakobi, Angelika 1990, A Fur grammar. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.

Janda, Laura A. & Charles E. Townsend 2000, Czech. Munich: LINCOM EUROPA.

Jörg, Christine 1989,  Isländische Konjugationstabellen / Icelandic Conjugation Tables / Tableaux de Conjugaison Islandaise / Beygingatöflur Íslenskra Sagna. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.

Juola, Patrick 1998, Measuring linguistic complexity: The morphological tier. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 5:3, 206-13.

Karlsson, F. 1999, Finnish: An essential grammar. London and New York: Routledge.

Kimball, Geoffrey D. 1991, Koasati Grammar. Lincoln & London: University of Nebraska Press.

Kolmogorov, A. N. 1965, Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information. Problems in Information Transmission 1, 1–7.

Kusters, Wouter 2008, Complexity in linguistic theory, language learning and language change.  In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson (eds), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 3-22. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Kutsch Lojenga, Constance 1994, Ngiti: A Central-Sudanic language of Zaire [Nilo-Saharan Linguistic Analyses and Documentation, vol. 9]. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.

LaFontaine, Harlan & Neil McKay 2005, 550 Daḳota verbs. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Historical Society Press.

Li, M., & P. Vitányi 1997, An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its applications (2nd edition). New York: Springer.

Liu, Q.; Z. He; Y. Liu; & S. Lin 2008, Maximum entropy based rule selection model for syntax-based statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP ’08, Honolulu, Hawaii, 89–97. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Maiden, Martin 2009, Where does heteroclisis come from? Evidence from Romanian dialects. Morphology 19, 59–86.

Malouf, Rob & Farrell Ackerman 2010a, An evolutionary explanation for the Paradigm Economy Principle. Paper presented at 2010 Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Baltimore.

Malouf, Rob & Farrell Ackerman 2010b, Paradigm entropy as a measure of morphological simplicity.  Paper presented at the workshop ‘Morphological Complexity: Implications for the Theory of Language’, Harvard University, January 22, 2010.

Malouf, Rob & Farrell Ackerman 2010c, Paradigms: The low entropy conjecture. Paper presented at the Workshop on Morphology and Formal Grammar, Université Paris Diderot, July 8, 2010.

Malouf, Rob & Farrell Ackerman 2011a, Paradigmatics, syntagmatics, and the agglutinative analogue. Paper presented at the Workshop on Quantitative Measures in Morphology and Morphological Development, Center for Human Development, UC San Diego, January 15-16, 2011.

Malouf, Rob & Farrell Ackerman 2011b, The low entropy conjecture: The challenges of Modern Irish nominal declension. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Challenges of Complex Morphology to Morphological Theory, Linguistic Society of America Summer Institute, Boulder, CO, July 27, 2011.

Marvan, Jiří 1979, Modern Lithuanian declension: A study of its infrastructure. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

Matthews, P. H. 1972, Inflectional morphology: A theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McWhorter, John 2001, The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 5: 125-66.

McWhorter, John 2008, Why does a language undress?  Strange cases in Indonesia. In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson (eds), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 167-90. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Merrifield, William R. 1968, Palantla Chinantec grammar. Serie Científica (Museo Nacional de Antropología) 9. Mexico: Museo Nacional de Antropología.

Miestamo, Matti 2006, On the feasibility of complexity metrics. In K. Kerge & M.-M. Sepper (eds), Finest linguistics: Proceedings of the Annual Finnish and Estonian Conference of Linguistics, Tallinn, May 6-7, 2004, 11-26. Tallinn: Tallinn University Department of Estonian.

Miestamo, Matti 2008, Grammatical complexity in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson (eds), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 23-41. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Miestamo, Matti; Kaius Sinnemäki; & Fred Karlsson (eds.) 2008, Language complexity: Typology, contact, change. Amsterdam:  John Benjamins.

Milin, Petar; Victor Kuperman; Aleksandar Kostić; and R. Harald Baayen 2009, Words and paradigms bit by bit: An information-theoretic approach to the processing of paradigmatic structure in inflection and derivation. In James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds.), Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition, 214-52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Montermini, Fabio & Gilles Boyé 2012, Stem relations and inflection class assignment in Italian. Word Structure 5, 69-87.

Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín 2011, The mirage of morphological complexity. Paper presented at the Workshop on Quantitative Measures in Morphology and Morphological Development, Center for Human Development, UC San Diego, January 15-16, 2011.

Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín; Aleksandar Kostic; & R. Harald Baayen 2004, Putting the bits together: An information-theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition 94:1, 1–18.

Nichols, Johanna 1992,  Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Nichols, Johanna 2007, The distribution of complexity in the world’s languages: Prospectus. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, Anaheim, California, January 2007.

Nichols, Johanna 2009, Linguistic complexity:  a comprehensive definition and survey. In Sampson et al. (2009), 110-25.

Nichols, Johanna, with J. Barnes & D. A. Peterson 2006, The robust bell curve of morphological complexity. Linguistic Typology 10, 96-108.

Pace, Wanda Jane 1990, Comaltepec Chinantec verb inflection. In William R. Merrifield & Calvin R. Rensch (eds.), Syllables, tone, and verb paradigms (Studies in Chinantec Languages 4), 21-62.  Summer Institute of Linguistics & The University of Texas at Arlington.

Prasada, Sandeep & Steven Pinker 1993, Generalization of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 1–56.

Robins, R. H. 1959, In defence of WP. Transactions of the Philological Society 58, 116-144.

Sampson, Geoffrey 2009, A linguistic axiom challenged. In Sampson et al. (2009), 1-18.

Sampson, Geoffrey; David Gil; & Peter Trudgill (eds.) 2009, Language complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.

Sapir, Edward 1921, Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.

Schlegel, Friedrich von 1808, Über die Sprache und Weisheit der Indier: Ein Beitrag zur Begründung der Alterthumskunde.  Heidelberg: Mohr & Zimmer.

Schmitt, N., & G. Underwood 2004, Exploring the processing of formulaic sequences through a self-paced reading task. In N. Schmitt (ed.), Formulaic Sequences, 171-89.  Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Shannon, Claude E. 1951, Prediction and entropy of printed English. The Bell System Technical Journal 30: 50-64.

Shosted, Ryan K. 2006, Correlating complexity: A typological approach. Linguistic Typology 10, 1-40.

Sinnemäki, Kaius 2008, Complexity trade-offs in core argument marking. In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson (eds), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 67-88. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Sinnemäki, Kaius 2011, Language universals and linguistic complexity: Three case studies in core argument marking. University of Helsinki doctoral dissertation.

Stump, Gregory T. 2001, Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stump, Gregory T. 2006, Heteroclisis and paradigm linkage. Language 82: 279-322.

Stump, Gregory 2010, Paradigm templates, stem patterns and lexical representations.  Paper presented at the Workshop on Morphology and Formal Grammar, Université Paris Diderot, July 8, 2010.

Tremblay, A., B. Derwing, G. Libben & C. Westbury 2011, Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning 61: 569–613.

Wheelock, Frederic M. 1963, Latin: An introductory course based on ancient authors. New York: Barnes & Noble.

Whitney, William Dwight 1889, Sanskrit grammar [2^nd edition; 1950 reprint]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1984, Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. [Translated, by Manfred Schentke, as Inflectional morphology and naturalness (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989).]

Zoëga, Geir T. 1910, A concise dictionary of Old Icelandic. London: Oxford University Press.

Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985,  How to describe inflection. In Mary Niepokuj, Mary Van Clay, Vassiliki Nikiforidou & Deborah Feder (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 372-86.  Berkeley:  Berkeley Linguistics Society.

Zwicky, Arnold M. 1994, Morphological metageneralizations: morphology, phonology, and morphonology. Paper presented at the Kentucky Foreign Language Conference, University of Kentucky, April 1994.